- This topic has 106 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by
Tim.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
10 September, 2010 at 12:00 pm #5949
TimKeymasterJust a little thread to keep you updated with any developments of the slightest interest re: the blog.
-
10 September, 2010 at 12:02 pm #7038
TimKeymasterThe front page now has an “Articles from the archive” section, which gives you three random articles from our back-catalogue of 240-odd articles. Commenting is still open on old articles, so do feel free to chip in on something old even if there hasn’t been any discussion on it for years.
-
24 September, 2010 at 12:08 pm #7176
TimKeymasterJust a question about server performance – when you post a comment or something on the forums, would you say the site responded quickly or slowly? (Or, of course, somewhere in between the two)
-
24 September, 2010 at 12:55 pm #7178
Annette A
ParticipantWhen I’m posting from somewhere with a decent broadband speed (ie at work) it’s pretty fast, I’d say. It takes a while when I’m at home, due to the pathetic phone network BT have saddled us with in our village, and a lack of will on the part of virgin or anyone else to cable us. So I’d say the servers themselves were pretty good.
-
24 September, 2010 at 5:11 pm #7180
Hairy Gnome
ParticipantI would say the servers were a little on the slow side, but not so bad that it poses a problem even for someone with such a low tolerance of slow sites as me.
-
28 September, 2010 at 10:43 am #7192
Anonymous
InactiveI do find the site slightly slower to render than some others. Not really problematically so, but I have noticed that there’s a noticable delay on domain lookup, even before the page renders, and a slightly slow load while things gradually get themselves hidden/visible and all in the right places (I’ve always assumed this is the javascript/ajax loading in combined with jquery waiting for pageload to complete before executing)
</geek> -
28 September, 2010 at 9:04 pm #7193
-
30 September, 2010 at 11:32 am #7194
StephenParticipantSite is much quicker since the 27th for me

-
30 September, 2010 at 1:01 pm #7195
TimKeymasterGood good good!
-
22 October, 2010 at 2:37 pm #7363
TimKeymasterLatest developments:
– BuddyPress updated to latest version, you now see icons in the activity stream. Woo!
– Right hand navigation tidied up with a “quick links” box at the top with links to the main parts of the site.
– Facebook box on right hand size made less irritating and nice logos with links to other social media guff put in
– Sticky welcome post on front page -
25 October, 2010 at 12:33 pm #7402
TimKeymasterEagle-eyed readers will notice the sticky welcome post on front page has a sub-title – this week it’s “laughing to hide the tears”. I fancy I might change it from time to time, so if you’d like to suggest a sub-title let me know here!
-
27 October, 2010 at 2:20 pm #7438
-
27 October, 2010 at 3:04 pm #7443
-
9 December, 2010 at 3:21 pm #7683
TimKeymasterMinor update – posts now have the date at the top instead of the time. A two minute fix for something that’s really been annoying me for months!
-
26 January, 2011 at 1:07 pm #8004
TimKeymasterSite updates:
1) the much neglected “Resources” section has been tidied up and prettified. http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/resources
2) the top menu has been tidied, removing the “Groups” and “Members” tabs which were never used
3) A new page for posting up Excel templates for blood glucose logging – http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/resources/logging-templates/ -
26 January, 2011 at 1:13 pm #8006
lizzParticipantAha, I was wondering where all the tabs had gone. I find when I’ve logged to the ‘forums’ page, often the time of the last posting is say 59 seconds ago or something, but if I go to that posting in fact it was 20 minutes or 2 hours.
I have found the site less easy to use than others, which make sense very quickly.
-
26 January, 2011 at 1:14 pm #8007
lizzParticipantPLUS for instance, I just posted that comment above, and after posting I was still on the first page, and my comment was here, on the second page. That is very illogical.
-
26 January, 2011 at 1:21 pm #8009
TimKeymaster@lizz – the time thing being wonky is a “feature” (or “bug” as we like to call them) in Buddypress, so there’s not much I can do about it I’m afraid.
I agree – I think the Forums and Activity features aren’t entirely user-friendly; but I’m stuck with Buddypress as it was, frankly, the best of a bad lot which fitted my criteria for blog / forum integration. There is better forum software out there (older readers will recall the forums used to be completely separate from the blog and were accessed through a sub-domain and which used some different forum software) , but it just doesn’t mesh so well with the blog. I guess we just have to take the rough with the smooth.
-
26 January, 2011 at 1:37 pm #8010
-
27 January, 2011 at 9:48 am #8034
TimKeymasterBlog updates:
1) mySQL database moved to a new server, so hopefully better performance and fewer crappy timeouts!
-
27 January, 2011 at 10:01 am #8035
Anonymous
InactiveGood work @tim
Just to bug ya.. Need to short your blog description out for us using mobile like devices. I know, I know you could not give a rats ***, but we live in hope.. Emailed you a screenshot. -
27 January, 2011 at 11:15 am #8036
TimKeymasterDone and done Mike!
-
27 January, 2011 at 1:06 pm #8039
Anonymous
InactiveGood and good!
” iPad say’s hi **wave** ” -
27 January, 2011 at 2:17 pm #8041
TimKeymasterYou haven’t got an iPad have you Mike? You didn’t mention that in our last 300 emails at all

-
27 January, 2011 at 3:03 pm #8048
-
27 January, 2011 at 3:10 pm #8049
-
27 January, 2011 at 3:15 pm #8050
StephenParticipantYou’re welcome

Personal opinion : don’t like the gradient – just seems to darken the whole page.
Professional opinion : blue text on grey background (subtitle) is not a combination I would use on a web site Blue text is dodgy due to poor reception by the eye anyway (especially my knackered ones!) but when used on grey it’s not terribly readable.In my humble opinion …….
-
27 January, 2011 at 3:25 pm #8051
TimKeymasterDidn’t you get the memo about not being allowed to express personal opinions on here?

There was a dark gradient there before (black at the top to navy blue below), so this one’s actually a bit lighter. TBH, I’m not really that keen on the look and feel of any of the site, but I don’t have the mad design skillz to improve it that much.
If you fancy re-doing the banner yourself to something you would like to see, then it needs to be 1250×125 pixels in size and the font is “London Between” which you can get from dafont.com.

-
27 January, 2011 at 3:30 pm #8052
StephenParticipantThe memo was in blue text so I couldn’t read it
I wonder if the green used on the “Reply Posted” and other notifications would work ….. I’ve got some serious astronomy to do tonight but if I get 10 minutes I’ll see if anything springs to mind 
-
27 January, 2011 at 3:40 pm #8053
Anonymous
InactiveOpen it up to the floor, perhaps a little competition and mini poll/vote to decide which one?
Just a thought?
-
27 January, 2011 at 3:52 pm #8054
TimKeymasterVote? Poll? Common consent? All sounds dangerously communist to me.
All I want is for a talented designer to come forward and offer to redo the entire for free. I do realise the prospects of this happening in reality are very slim.
-
27 January, 2011 at 4:17 pm #8055
Annette A
ParticipantThe blue subtitle is almost invisible on my screen, as the hue is too close to the grey.
(I’m a born critic, I know
) -
27 January, 2011 at 5:26 pm #8057
Anonymous
InactiveOoh, I’d love to offer to help if only I was a talented web designer. In my opinion the banner that mentions rotting toes (nice) should be in orange (i.e. the same orange that shows times since recent activity) or white. It would stand out a lot better, unless you don’t want it to stand out :o)
-
27 January, 2011 at 5:27 pm #8058
Anonymous
InactiveAnd by banner I mean the text in the banner that mentions the toes thing, not the whole banner! :o)
-
27 January, 2011 at 6:23 pm #8060
lizzParticipantOMG never noticed the rotting toes! I may have stayed away if I had!
-
27 January, 2011 at 6:44 pm #8062
-
27 January, 2011 at 7:47 pm #8066
AlisonKeymasterAs co-writer of this thing I suppose I should care about all of this but I’m afraid my anorak is in the wash so I won’t be able to join the pixel/banner/theme/colourblind/ipad geekfest. If I was to summon up every ounce of effort and force myself to have an opinion, I’d say that I like the new banner thing less than the old one but I’d struggle to say why.
-
27 January, 2011 at 8:17 pm #8067
-
27 January, 2011 at 8:40 pm #8068
TimKeymasterIt’s not that bad a new banner, damn you all!
I wanted to use a new and more distinct font – which we could also use on the forthcoming video blog titles. So I redid the header and the colours too while I was at it. (As an aside, I’m really into fonts now, having read “Just My Type” (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Just-My-Type-About-Fonts/dp/1846683017) – a book all about fonts – over Christmas).
-
27 January, 2011 at 8:57 pm #8069
AlisonKeymaster@Stephen Loser is a bit strong. I’d have settled for the fact that you’re all a bit special. The husband is a fully fledged geek so I am experienced in these matters. I know you no longer have real anoraks, but I’m convinced you all have virtual anoraks that you put on at times like this. I’ve seen it happen too many times

-
28 January, 2011 at 12:21 am #8070
lizzParticipantIt’s a slippery slope into geekdom when you start bandying around phrases like ‘I read a book about fonts over Christmas’. And think that a remark such as ‘I’m really into fonts now’ can pass as an aside.
Although, actually, I have to admit… I LOVE browsing font sites. I often download something special for the weekend. Or a particular project. In fact I have a regular weekly update by email of new, spectacular, bright, crazy, cool or smoooooooth fonts.
Just off to put my bedtime anorak on.
-
28 January, 2011 at 8:50 am #8071
-
28 January, 2011 at 9:33 am #8072
Annette A
ParticipantI hate the Gill Sans font. (It has bad memories for me). I must get hold of this book, it sounds interesting…(Being a geek just means you know more about the subject in question (fonts? Banners?) than the person calling you a geek
.) -
28 January, 2011 at 4:12 pm #8080
-
28 January, 2011 at 5:33 pm #8082
-
7 February, 2011 at 4:10 pm #8149
Annette A
Participant@stephen has found a minor glitch in my logging sheet (cheers Stephen!) – It only affects the graph of the bolusing on the 8th day. I’ve sent a new version to @Tim to upload, (for those who know how to use excel quite well it’s straight forward to correct, for those who dont, just use the new version when it arrives
)
(If anyone finds any other problems, let me know – I tried to find all of the them (its mainly to do with where the graphs are taking their data from), but there’s always one that sneaks through…) -
7 February, 2011 at 4:59 pm #8150
TimKeymasterNew version uploaded and the old link should now grab the new file!
-
15 February, 2011 at 3:30 pm #8212
Hairy Gnome
Participant@Tim – is there any possibility you can allow editing of one’s own posts on the main blog? Not essential I know, but despite my best proof reading efforts the occasional typo slips through, it’s embarrassing!

-
15 February, 2011 at 4:21 pm #8213
-
10 March, 2011 at 4:23 pm #8343
TimKeymasterThis is only a test after an upgrade – remain calm!
-
24 March, 2011 at 11:28 am #8411
TimKeymasterI’ve just re-jigged the links page to make it more user-friendly and actually slightly useful:
http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/resources/useful-websites/
I will have missed approximately 16.9 million useful websites, so could you reply here or drop me an email with the ones I’ve neglected to list please? Ta!
-
24 March, 2011 at 3:37 pm #8414
DaveParticipantAll good. Can I add http://www.bdec-e-learning.com/ that I was directed towards by @Alison for a quick carb counting guide? Just completed the course and whilst I’m sure it’s nowhere near as good as the the full-on DAFNE it’s a start.
Also for the manufacturers I’d add http://www.accu-chek.co.uk/gb/ as I like their meters and you can quickly ask online for replacement batteries and books etc – just don’t expect them to be too quick in delivery.
-
24 March, 2011 at 3:44 pm #8416
Anonymous
InactiveI would second the BDEC course, good intro to carb counting.. Also something complete away from Diabetes – http://theoatmeal.com/ We all need a larf from time to time.

-
24 March, 2011 at 3:55 pm #8420
TimKeymasterThanks chaps – duly added!
-
25 March, 2011 at 9:02 am #8434
TimKeymasterIn other news, I was looking through the stats today and loads of our traffic comes from search engine searches for terms like “king charles spaniel, king charles cavalier, cavalier king charles spaniel” and “Woof!” (http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/2010/07/woof/) is one of our most popular articles.
More people come to Shoot Up by searching for dogs than diabetes. This is so depressing I don’t even know where to begin!

-
15 April, 2011 at 2:50 pm #8603
Annette A
ParticipantAny chance of adding another converter to the RHS – one that covers the change from % to mmol (or whatever the new version is actually in) for HbA1Cs?
-
15 April, 2011 at 2:57 pm #8604
TimKeymasterNext you’ll be wanting the moon on a stick! I’ll have a look…
-
15 April, 2011 at 2:59 pm #8605
TimKeymasterDo you know if there’s an easy formula to convert one to the other?
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:00 pm #8606
Annette A
ParticipantIs it sugar free? If so, I’d like 2 please

-
15 April, 2011 at 3:00 pm #8607
Annette A
ParticipantOh, yes there is. I have seen it, I’ll go hunt.
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:02 pm #8608
TimKeymasterWikipedia says IFCC-HbA1c (mmol/mol) = [DCCT-HbA1c (%) – 2.15] × 10.929
Hmmm….
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:04 pm #8609
Annette A
ParticipantVoila:
/>
(old value HbA1c (%) – 2.15) x 10.929 = new value in mmol/mol. -
15 April, 2011 at 3:06 pm #8611
Annette A
ParticipantMine came from Diabetes UK, so for once you can believe Wikipedia!
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:09 pm #8612
Annette A
ParticipantWhy do square brackets (and contents) disappear when looked at in the Activities tab?
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:13 pm #8613
TimKeymasterSquare brackets and what not get stripped out to (probably) prevent insertion of rogue code! I’ve got a new box down at the bottom right with a converter. Amusingly it gives the wrong answer.
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:27 pm #8614
TimKeymasterI’ve taken it off and given up! If anyone is better at me at basic Javascript functions (!) then could they drop me an email please?

-
15 April, 2011 at 4:00 pm #8615
AlisonKeymasterThat would be handy. My head is currently in the sand about the HbA1c changes – after using the old way for practically my entire life, I feel like a pensioner who’s suddenly been told they have to measure things in centimeters and kilograms!
-
5 August, 2011 at 2:28 pm #8897
TimKeymasterBlog latest: just a small technical tweak so that member profile pages don’t get indexed on search engines. This should protect you from stalkers and Internet wierdos. There are more than enough already on Shoot Up ;-b
-
9 August, 2011 at 2:23 pm #8898
TimKeymasterBlog latest: another minor tweak – the section with the user pictures on right hand side now displays the top twelve contributors in terms of comments on blog posts in the last 30 days (excluding me and Alison). It used to display the last 15 logged-in users. Thought it might make a change.
-
9 August, 2011 at 2:28 pm #8899
AlisonKeymasterAh, I sense someone trying to start some competition!
-
9 August, 2011 at 2:39 pm #8900
TimKeymasterIndeed! Sadly it doesn’t count forum posts – which is a bit of pain, but hey hum!
-
9 August, 2011 at 3:13 pm #8902
-
9 August, 2011 at 3:22 pm #8903
TimKeymasterThank heavens for that – there’s 320-odd posts in that thread now!
In terms of greasy hands, your wish is my command – I’ve added a “About you & your diabetes” text box to the profiles, so you can fill in a bit more detail. You can edit your profile by clicking on your name in the top right corner > Profile tab > Edit profile > Fill in new box.
Don’t say I’m not kind to you!
-
9 August, 2011 at 4:45 pm #8904
-
9 August, 2011 at 5:10 pm #8905
-
9 August, 2011 at 5:15 pm #8906
TimKeymastersrc=”smileys/frown.gif” width=”” height=”” alt=”:-(” title=”:-(” class=”bbcode_smiley” />
-
16 August, 2011 at 7:48 am #8921
TimKeymasterChanged it back to the old style thingy as I preferred it.
-
18 August, 2011 at 10:17 am #8940
TimKeymasterI’ve added an “Off topic” section to the forums – for discussion of things non-diabetic, for example what I’m planning to read on my holidays. We’ll see if anyone uses it and will maintain / delete it as required!
-
26 September, 2011 at 12:48 pm #9007
TimKeymasterUpgraded blog to latest major release of BuddyPress – which might give us some new features to play with. Chief amongst these is the ability to use the search box in the top right to search the forums *and* blogs posts from the same place. Hurrah!
Updated the theme to latest theme – will fix the header soon.
-
27 September, 2011 at 1:28 pm #9019
Annette A
ParticipantBut I’ve lost the little link ‘View’ which allowed me to jump straight to the post, rather than the start of the thread. Can we have it back? Or has it moved somewhere I cant see it?
-
27 September, 2011 at 1:48 pm #9020
CecileParticipantClick the time-link to view&see…
-
27 September, 2011 at 2:19 pm #9021
-
27 September, 2011 at 6:59 pm #9022
-
27 September, 2011 at 8:55 pm #9023
CecileParticipantI’m just relieved this is Shoot up – if it had been Twitter, a blind poking at meaningless symbols would’ve caused friends, favourites & retweets (phew!)
-
29 September, 2011 at 12:27 pm #9027
TimKeymasterIf anyone cares, we’ve just turned down yet another offer for advertising on the site. Aside from the stripykat advert on the bottom right, we’ve always had a strict no advertising policy. Even ads from reputable pharma companies. This is because I hate blogs covered in ads and I presume you do too.
If you’re interested, Alison and I share the hosting costs for the site between us. They’re pretty modest and so we’re not prevented from running our second yachts, etc.
-
7 December, 2011 at 3:42 pm #9195
TimKeymasterMore updates on the site – a new look (which is pretty similar to the old look, but just tweaked a bit). There’s also a new front page – which is designed to allow quick access to everything that’s on the site – both the forums and the blog in one place. Hopefully you’ll hate it and yearn for the old format again.
-
7 December, 2011 at 6:05 pm #9199
Annette A
ParticipantDon’t like the font…

-
7 December, 2011 at 6:09 pm #9201
TimKeymasterInterestingly enough the one at the top in one of Google’s web fonts that’s generated on the fly. Technology and all that!
-
8 December, 2011 at 8:33 am #9202
Annette A
ParticipantIt is easier to use/see on a mobile device now though (that’s an android smartphone, not a fruit based product, although I’m sure it still applies…)
-
8 December, 2011 at 8:59 am #9203
TimKeymasterIs it? I’ve had another user on Twitter saying it’s worse to look at on a mobile device! I haven’t actually looked at it on mine – that would imply some sort of design process, rather than just making it up on the fly
-
8 December, 2011 at 12:00 pm #9219
-
9 December, 2011 at 7:21 am #9227
CecileParticipantThe home page’s “Recent sitewide activity” takes about half a day to update (though you do get it clicking the “Activity” tab at the top).
-
9 December, 2011 at 8:59 am #9228
TimKeymaster@ckoei – that’s a feature not a bug – the feeds on the front page are cached to save them having to be reloaded every time someone visits – thus saving wear and tear on the server.
I guessed that most people come and have a look at the site at most once a day or so or every couple of days, so it should give most people an overview of what’s going on. The activity tab is – as always – the place for your latest Shoot Up fix!
-
9 December, 2011 at 9:38 am #9232
-
9 December, 2011 at 10:49 am #9234
Anonymous
InactiveWell I like the new look!
Its rather tastefully done in ; -
9 December, 2011 at 11:07 am #9235
TimKeymasterThanks @Mustard – I wanted it to be easy on the eye. I hate forums that have too much going on – especially forums that allow signatures at the bottom of every post – awful, just awful!
The blatant advertising is a very important part of the site – I think everyone should do their Christmas shopping over at stripykat.com – the Kindle cases are selling like hot cakes!

-
14 December, 2011 at 9:04 pm #9286
Anonymous
InactiveAnyword on how the mobile side of the site goes?
I’ve gone from it being rather cluttered to just getting a blank page when I click on forums (the blogs page works though)Is this payback for complaining?
-
14 December, 2011 at 9:28 pm #9287
TimKeymaster@furrypaul – damned right, next complaint and you’re banned from the site!

Nah, I haven’t looked at it yet, but it’s working its way up the list.
-
12 January, 2012 at 3:03 pm #9373
TimKeymaster@furrypaul – I’ve tweaked the site and it should now display better on a mobile device. Can you let me know if it doesn’t?

-
19 January, 2012 at 1:41 pm #9435
TimKeymasterIf anyone cares, Shoot Up is now on a new hosting platform. You shouldn’t really notice any difference – aside from, hopefully, a slight speed increase.
-
19 January, 2012 at 7:37 pm #9440
Anonymous
InactiveWhatever happened with the transfer at Lunch its sorted my phone out!
I can see the site again in a readable form, don’t press any more buttons on the server & I’ll do the same with my phone! -
20 January, 2012 at 9:24 am #9453
TimKeymaster@furrypaul – I fixed that about a week ago! But yesterday I also had to remove the compression doubry*, which might effect how you see the site too if you were using an older browser.
*”doubry” being a technical term
-
20 January, 2012 at 10:25 am #9455
Anonymous
InactiveThe update last week let me access the site on the phone again but this ones actually made it so I can use it.
I’d been meaning to drop you a line to let you know but I’m more often on phone than by a pc.
-
20 January, 2012 at 10:29 am #9457
TimKeymasterAhhh – that’ll definitely be the compression thing then…
-
20 January, 2012 at 10:31 am #9458
TimKeymasterIn other news, I’m working on tweaking the front page so that it updates more quickly. You have to wait a day or so for the latest posts, etc., to appear, which isn’t ideal. If any readers are experts on incorporating feeds into WordPress pages, then please do get in touch

-
20 January, 2012 at 4:48 pm #9469
TimKeymasterFront page now tweaked – should update recent activity, news posts and so on instantly. If it looks a bit weird then it might be you’re caching the old CSS file – it’ll sort itself out soon enough
-
13 February, 2012 at 10:44 am #9558
TimKeymasterThere’s a new front page – I would like to say this was a planned change. However, a plugin update destroyed my old front page and *cough* I didn’t have a backup because I’m an idiot. So a new page was rapidly rebuilt from scratch. D’oh!
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
