Home › Forums › Living with type one › About the blog
- This topic has 158 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 8 months ago by
Tim.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
10 September, 2010 at 12:00 pm #9872
TimKeymasterJust a little thread to keep you updated with any developments of the slightest interest re: the blog.
-
10 September, 2010 at 12:02 pm #11053
TimKeymasterThe front page now has an “Articles from the archive” section, which gives you three random articles from our back-catalogue of 240-odd articles. Commenting is still open on old articles, so do feel free to chip in on something old even if there hasn’t been any discussion on it for years.
-
24 September, 2010 at 12:08 pm #11191
TimKeymasterJust a question about server performance – when you post a comment or something on the forums, would you say the site responded quickly or slowly? (Or, of course, somewhere in between the two)
-
24 September, 2010 at 12:55 pm #11193
Annette A
ParticipantWhen I’m posting from somewhere with a decent broadband speed (ie at work) it’s pretty fast, I’d say. It takes a while when I’m at home, due to the pathetic phone network BT have saddled us with in our village, and a lack of will on the part of virgin or anyone else to cable us. So I’d say the servers themselves were pretty good.
-
24 September, 2010 at 5:11 pm #11195
Hairy Gnome
ParticipantI would say the servers were a little on the slow side, but not so bad that it poses a problem even for someone with such a low tolerance of slow sites as me.
-
28 September, 2010 at 10:43 am #11207
Anonymous
InactiveI do find the site slightly slower to render than some others. Not really problematically so, but I have noticed that there’s a noticable delay on domain lookup, even before the page renders, and a slightly slow load while things gradually get themselves hidden/visible and all in the right places (I’ve always assumed this is the javascript/ajax loading in combined with jquery waiting for pageload to complete before executing)
</geek> -
28 September, 2010 at 9:04 pm #11208
-
30 September, 2010 at 11:32 am #11209
StephenParticipantSite is much quicker since the 27th for me

-
30 September, 2010 at 1:01 pm #11210
TimKeymasterGood good good!
-
22 October, 2010 at 2:37 pm #11378
TimKeymasterLatest developments:
– BuddyPress updated to latest version, you now see icons in the activity stream. Woo!
– Right hand navigation tidied up with a “quick links” box at the top with links to the main parts of the site.
– Facebook box on right hand size made less irritating and nice logos with links to other social media guff put in
– Sticky welcome post on front page -
25 October, 2010 at 12:33 pm #11417
TimKeymasterEagle-eyed readers will notice the sticky welcome post on front page has a sub-title – this week it’s “laughing to hide the tears”. I fancy I might change it from time to time, so if you’d like to suggest a sub-title let me know here!
-
27 October, 2010 at 2:20 pm #11453
-
27 October, 2010 at 3:04 pm #11458
-
9 December, 2010 at 3:21 pm #11698
TimKeymasterMinor update – posts now have the date at the top instead of the time. A two minute fix for something that’s really been annoying me for months!
-
26 January, 2011 at 1:07 pm #12019
TimKeymasterSite updates:
1) the much neglected “Resources” section has been tidied up and prettified. http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/resources
2) the top menu has been tidied, removing the “Groups” and “Members” tabs which were never used
3) A new page for posting up Excel templates for blood glucose logging – http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/resources/logging-templates/ -
26 January, 2011 at 1:13 pm #12021
lizzParticipantAha, I was wondering where all the tabs had gone. I find when I’ve logged to the ‘forums’ page, often the time of the last posting is say 59 seconds ago or something, but if I go to that posting in fact it was 20 minutes or 2 hours.
I have found the site less easy to use than others, which make sense very quickly.
-
26 January, 2011 at 1:14 pm #12022
lizzParticipantPLUS for instance, I just posted that comment above, and after posting I was still on the first page, and my comment was here, on the second page. That is very illogical.
-
26 January, 2011 at 1:21 pm #12024
TimKeymaster@lizz – the time thing being wonky is a “feature” (or “bug” as we like to call them) in Buddypress, so there’s not much I can do about it I’m afraid.
I agree – I think the Forums and Activity features aren’t entirely user-friendly; but I’m stuck with Buddypress as it was, frankly, the best of a bad lot which fitted my criteria for blog / forum integration. There is better forum software out there (older readers will recall the forums used to be completely separate from the blog and were accessed through a sub-domain and which used some different forum software) , but it just doesn’t mesh so well with the blog. I guess we just have to take the rough with the smooth.
-
26 January, 2011 at 1:37 pm #12025
-
27 January, 2011 at 9:48 am #12049
TimKeymasterBlog updates:
1) mySQL database moved to a new server, so hopefully better performance and fewer crappy timeouts!
-
27 January, 2011 at 10:01 am #12050
Anonymous
InactiveGood work @tim
Just to bug ya.. Need to short your blog description out for us using mobile like devices. I know, I know you could not give a rats ***, but we live in hope.. Emailed you a screenshot. -
27 January, 2011 at 11:15 am #12051
TimKeymasterDone and done Mike!
-
27 January, 2011 at 1:06 pm #12054
Anonymous
InactiveGood and good!
” iPad say’s hi **wave** ” -
27 January, 2011 at 2:17 pm #12056
TimKeymasterYou haven’t got an iPad have you Mike? You didn’t mention that in our last 300 emails at all

-
27 January, 2011 at 3:03 pm #12063
-
27 January, 2011 at 3:10 pm #12064
-
27 January, 2011 at 3:15 pm #12065
StephenParticipantYou’re welcome

Personal opinion : don’t like the gradient – just seems to darken the whole page.
Professional opinion : blue text on grey background (subtitle) is not a combination I would use on a web site Blue text is dodgy due to poor reception by the eye anyway (especially my knackered ones!) but when used on grey it’s not terribly readable.In my humble opinion …….
-
27 January, 2011 at 3:25 pm #12066
TimKeymasterDidn’t you get the memo about not being allowed to express personal opinions on here?

There was a dark gradient there before (black at the top to navy blue below), so this one’s actually a bit lighter. TBH, I’m not really that keen on the look and feel of any of the site, but I don’t have the mad design skillz to improve it that much.
If you fancy re-doing the banner yourself to something you would like to see, then it needs to be 1250×125 pixels in size and the font is “London Between” which you can get from dafont.com.

-
27 January, 2011 at 3:30 pm #12067
StephenParticipantThe memo was in blue text so I couldn’t read it
I wonder if the green used on the “Reply Posted” and other notifications would work ….. I’ve got some serious astronomy to do tonight but if I get 10 minutes I’ll see if anything springs to mind 
-
27 January, 2011 at 3:40 pm #12068
Anonymous
InactiveOpen it up to the floor, perhaps a little competition and mini poll/vote to decide which one?
Just a thought?
-
27 January, 2011 at 3:52 pm #12069
TimKeymasterVote? Poll? Common consent? All sounds dangerously communist to me.
All I want is for a talented designer to come forward and offer to redo the entire for free. I do realise the prospects of this happening in reality are very slim.
-
27 January, 2011 at 4:17 pm #12070
Annette A
ParticipantThe blue subtitle is almost invisible on my screen, as the hue is too close to the grey.
(I’m a born critic, I know
) -
27 January, 2011 at 5:26 pm #12072
Anonymous
InactiveOoh, I’d love to offer to help if only I was a talented web designer. In my opinion the banner that mentions rotting toes (nice) should be in orange (i.e. the same orange that shows times since recent activity) or white. It would stand out a lot better, unless you don’t want it to stand out :o)
-
27 January, 2011 at 5:27 pm #12073
Anonymous
InactiveAnd by banner I mean the text in the banner that mentions the toes thing, not the whole banner! :o)
-
27 January, 2011 at 6:23 pm #12075
lizzParticipantOMG never noticed the rotting toes! I may have stayed away if I had!
-
27 January, 2011 at 6:44 pm #12077
-
27 January, 2011 at 7:47 pm #12081
AlisonKeymasterAs co-writer of this thing I suppose I should care about all of this but I’m afraid my anorak is in the wash so I won’t be able to join the pixel/banner/theme/colourblind/ipad geekfest. If I was to summon up every ounce of effort and force myself to have an opinion, I’d say that I like the new banner thing less than the old one but I’d struggle to say why.
-
27 January, 2011 at 8:17 pm #12082
-
27 January, 2011 at 8:40 pm #12083
TimKeymasterIt’s not that bad a new banner, damn you all!
I wanted to use a new and more distinct font – which we could also use on the forthcoming video blog titles. So I redid the header and the colours too while I was at it. (As an aside, I’m really into fonts now, having read “Just My Type” (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Just-My-Type-About-Fonts/dp/1846683017) – a book all about fonts – over Christmas).
-
27 January, 2011 at 8:57 pm #12084
AlisonKeymaster@Stephen Loser is a bit strong. I’d have settled for the fact that you’re all a bit special. The husband is a fully fledged geek so I am experienced in these matters. I know you no longer have real anoraks, but I’m convinced you all have virtual anoraks that you put on at times like this. I’ve seen it happen too many times

-
28 January, 2011 at 12:21 am #12085
lizzParticipantIt’s a slippery slope into geekdom when you start bandying around phrases like ‘I read a book about fonts over Christmas’. And think that a remark such as ‘I’m really into fonts now’ can pass as an aside.
Although, actually, I have to admit… I LOVE browsing font sites. I often download something special for the weekend. Or a particular project. In fact I have a regular weekly update by email of new, spectacular, bright, crazy, cool or smoooooooth fonts.
Just off to put my bedtime anorak on.
-
28 January, 2011 at 8:50 am #12086
-
28 January, 2011 at 9:33 am #12087
Annette A
ParticipantI hate the Gill Sans font. (It has bad memories for me). I must get hold of this book, it sounds interesting…(Being a geek just means you know more about the subject in question (fonts? Banners?) than the person calling you a geek
.) -
28 January, 2011 at 4:12 pm #12095
-
28 January, 2011 at 5:33 pm #12097
-
7 February, 2011 at 4:10 pm #12164
Annette A
Participant@stephen has found a minor glitch in my logging sheet (cheers Stephen!) – It only affects the graph of the bolusing on the 8th day. I’ve sent a new version to @Tim to upload, (for those who know how to use excel quite well it’s straight forward to correct, for those who dont, just use the new version when it arrives
)
(If anyone finds any other problems, let me know – I tried to find all of the them (its mainly to do with where the graphs are taking their data from), but there’s always one that sneaks through…) -
7 February, 2011 at 4:59 pm #12165
TimKeymasterNew version uploaded and the old link should now grab the new file!
-
15 February, 2011 at 3:30 pm #12227
Hairy Gnome
Participant@Tim – is there any possibility you can allow editing of one’s own posts on the main blog? Not essential I know, but despite my best proof reading efforts the occasional typo slips through, it’s embarrassing!

-
15 February, 2011 at 4:21 pm #12228
-
10 March, 2011 at 4:23 pm #12363
TimKeymasterThis is only a test after an upgrade – remain calm!
-
24 March, 2011 at 11:28 am #12431
TimKeymasterI’ve just re-jigged the links page to make it more user-friendly and actually slightly useful:
http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/resources/useful-websites/
I will have missed approximately 16.9 million useful websites, so could you reply here or drop me an email with the ones I’ve neglected to list please? Ta!
-
24 March, 2011 at 3:37 pm #12434
DaveParticipantAll good. Can I add http://www.bdec-e-learning.com/ that I was directed towards by @Alison for a quick carb counting guide? Just completed the course and whilst I’m sure it’s nowhere near as good as the the full-on DAFNE it’s a start.
Also for the manufacturers I’d add http://www.accu-chek.co.uk/gb/ as I like their meters and you can quickly ask online for replacement batteries and books etc – just don’t expect them to be too quick in delivery.
-
24 March, 2011 at 3:44 pm #12436
Anonymous
InactiveI would second the BDEC course, good intro to carb counting.. Also something complete away from Diabetes – http://theoatmeal.com/ We all need a larf from time to time.

-
24 March, 2011 at 3:55 pm #12440
TimKeymasterThanks chaps – duly added!
-
25 March, 2011 at 9:02 am #12454
TimKeymasterIn other news, I was looking through the stats today and loads of our traffic comes from search engine searches for terms like “king charles spaniel, king charles cavalier, cavalier king charles spaniel” and “Woof!” (http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/2010/07/woof/) is one of our most popular articles.
More people come to Shoot Up by searching for dogs than diabetes. This is so depressing I don’t even know where to begin!

-
15 April, 2011 at 2:50 pm #12621
Annette A
ParticipantAny chance of adding another converter to the RHS – one that covers the change from % to mmol (or whatever the new version is actually in) for HbA1Cs?
-
15 April, 2011 at 2:57 pm #12622
TimKeymasterNext you’ll be wanting the moon on a stick! I’ll have a look…
-
15 April, 2011 at 2:59 pm #12623
TimKeymasterDo you know if there’s an easy formula to convert one to the other?
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:00 pm #12624
Annette A
ParticipantIs it sugar free? If so, I’d like 2 please

-
15 April, 2011 at 3:00 pm #12625
Annette A
ParticipantOh, yes there is. I have seen it, I’ll go hunt.
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:02 pm #12626
TimKeymasterWikipedia says IFCC-HbA1c (mmol/mol) = [DCCT-HbA1c (%) – 2.15] × 10.929
Hmmm….
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:04 pm #12627
Annette A
ParticipantVoila:
/>
(old value HbA1c (%) – 2.15) x 10.929 = new value in mmol/mol. -
15 April, 2011 at 3:06 pm #12629
Annette A
ParticipantMine came from Diabetes UK, so for once you can believe Wikipedia!
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:09 pm #12630
Annette A
ParticipantWhy do square brackets (and contents) disappear when looked at in the Activities tab?
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:13 pm #12631
TimKeymasterSquare brackets and what not get stripped out to (probably) prevent insertion of rogue code! I’ve got a new box down at the bottom right with a converter. Amusingly it gives the wrong answer.
-
15 April, 2011 at 3:27 pm #12632
TimKeymasterI’ve taken it off and given up! If anyone is better at me at basic Javascript functions (!) then could they drop me an email please?

-
15 April, 2011 at 4:00 pm #12633
AlisonKeymasterThat would be handy. My head is currently in the sand about the HbA1c changes – after using the old way for practically my entire life, I feel like a pensioner who’s suddenly been told they have to measure things in centimeters and kilograms!
-
5 August, 2011 at 2:28 pm #12917
TimKeymasterBlog latest: just a small technical tweak so that member profile pages don’t get indexed on search engines. This should protect you from stalkers and Internet wierdos. There are more than enough already on Shoot Up ;-b
-
9 August, 2011 at 2:23 pm #12918
TimKeymasterBlog latest: another minor tweak – the section with the user pictures on right hand side now displays the top twelve contributors in terms of comments on blog posts in the last 30 days (excluding me and Alison). It used to display the last 15 logged-in users. Thought it might make a change.
-
9 August, 2011 at 2:28 pm #12919
AlisonKeymasterAh, I sense someone trying to start some competition!
-
9 August, 2011 at 2:39 pm #12920
TimKeymasterIndeed! Sadly it doesn’t count forum posts – which is a bit of pain, but hey hum!
-
9 August, 2011 at 3:13 pm #12922
-
9 August, 2011 at 3:22 pm #12923
TimKeymasterThank heavens for that – there’s 320-odd posts in that thread now!
In terms of greasy hands, your wish is my command – I’ve added a “About you & your diabetes” text box to the profiles, so you can fill in a bit more detail. You can edit your profile by clicking on your name in the top right corner > Profile tab > Edit profile > Fill in new box.
Don’t say I’m not kind to you!
-
9 August, 2011 at 4:45 pm #12924
-
9 August, 2011 at 5:10 pm #12925
-
9 August, 2011 at 5:15 pm #12926
TimKeymastersrc=”smileys/frown.gif” width=”” height=”” alt=”:-(” title=”:-(” class=”bbcode_smiley” />
-
16 August, 2011 at 7:48 am #12941
TimKeymasterChanged it back to the old style thingy as I preferred it.
-
18 August, 2011 at 10:17 am #12960
TimKeymasterI’ve added an “Off topic” section to the forums – for discussion of things non-diabetic, for example what I’m planning to read on my holidays. We’ll see if anyone uses it and will maintain / delete it as required!
-
26 September, 2011 at 12:48 pm #13027
TimKeymasterUpgraded blog to latest major release of BuddyPress – which might give us some new features to play with. Chief amongst these is the ability to use the search box in the top right to search the forums *and* blogs posts from the same place. Hurrah!
Updated the theme to latest theme – will fix the header soon.
-
27 September, 2011 at 1:28 pm #13039
Annette A
ParticipantBut I’ve lost the little link ‘View’ which allowed me to jump straight to the post, rather than the start of the thread. Can we have it back? Or has it moved somewhere I cant see it?
-
27 September, 2011 at 1:48 pm #13040
CecileParticipantClick the time-link to view&see…
-
27 September, 2011 at 2:19 pm #13041
-
27 September, 2011 at 6:59 pm #13042
-
27 September, 2011 at 8:55 pm #13043
CecileParticipantI’m just relieved this is Shoot up – if it had been Twitter, a blind poking at meaningless symbols would’ve caused friends, favourites & retweets (phew!)
-
29 September, 2011 at 12:27 pm #13047
TimKeymasterIf anyone cares, we’ve just turned down yet another offer for advertising on the site. Aside from the stripykat advert on the bottom right, we’ve always had a strict no advertising policy. Even ads from reputable pharma companies. This is because I hate blogs covered in ads and I presume you do too.
If you’re interested, Alison and I share the hosting costs for the site between us. They’re pretty modest and so we’re not prevented from running our second yachts, etc.
-
7 December, 2011 at 3:42 pm #13215
TimKeymasterMore updates on the site – a new look (which is pretty similar to the old look, but just tweaked a bit). There’s also a new front page – which is designed to allow quick access to everything that’s on the site – both the forums and the blog in one place. Hopefully you’ll hate it and yearn for the old format again.
-
7 December, 2011 at 3:42 pm #13277
TimKeymasterMore updates on the site – a new look (which is pretty similar to the old look, but just tweaked a bit). There’s also a new front page – which is designed to allow quick access to everything that’s on the site – both the forums and the blog in one place. Hopefully you’ll hate it and yearn for the old format again.
-
7 December, 2011 at 6:05 pm #13281
Annette A
ParticipantDon’t like the font…

-
7 December, 2011 at 6:09 pm #13283
TimKeymasterInterestingly enough the one at the top in one of Google’s web fonts that’s generated on the fly. Technology and all that!
-
8 December, 2011 at 8:33 am #13284
Annette A
ParticipantIt is easier to use/see on a mobile device now though (that’s an android smartphone, not a fruit based product, although I’m sure it still applies…)
-
8 December, 2011 at 8:59 am #13285
TimKeymasterIs it? I’ve had another user on Twitter saying it’s worse to look at on a mobile device! I haven’t actually looked at it on mine – that would imply some sort of design process, rather than just making it up on the fly
-
8 December, 2011 at 12:00 pm #13301
-
9 December, 2011 at 7:21 am #13309
CecileParticipantThe home page’s “Recent sitewide activity” takes about half a day to update (though you do get it clicking the “Activity” tab at the top).
-
9 December, 2011 at 8:59 am #13310
TimKeymaster@ckoei – that’s a feature not a bug – the feeds on the front page are cached to save them having to be reloaded every time someone visits – thus saving wear and tear on the server.
I guessed that most people come and have a look at the site at most once a day or so or every couple of days, so it should give most people an overview of what’s going on. The activity tab is – as always – the place for your latest Shoot Up fix!
-
9 December, 2011 at 9:38 am #13314
-
9 December, 2011 at 10:49 am #13316
Anonymous
InactiveWell I like the new look!
Its rather tastefully done in ; -
9 December, 2011 at 11:07 am #13317
TimKeymasterThanks @Mustard – I wanted it to be easy on the eye. I hate forums that have too much going on – especially forums that allow signatures at the bottom of every post – awful, just awful!
The blatant advertising is a very important part of the site – I think everyone should do their Christmas shopping over at stripykat.com – the Kindle cases are selling like hot cakes!

-
14 December, 2011 at 9:04 pm #13368
Anonymous
InactiveAnyword on how the mobile side of the site goes?
I’ve gone from it being rather cluttered to just getting a blank page when I click on forums (the blogs page works though)Is this payback for complaining?
-
14 December, 2011 at 9:28 pm #13369
TimKeymaster@furrypaul – damned right, next complaint and you’re banned from the site!

Nah, I haven’t looked at it yet, but it’s working its way up the list.
-
12 January, 2012 at 3:03 pm #13455
TimKeymaster@furrypaul – I’ve tweaked the site and it should now display better on a mobile device. Can you let me know if it doesn’t?

-
12 January, 2012 at 3:03 pm #13554
TimKeymaster@furrypaul – I’ve tweaked the site and it should now display better on a mobile device. Can you let me know if it doesn’t?

-
19 January, 2012 at 1:41 pm #13616
TimKeymasterIf anyone cares, Shoot Up is now on a new hosting platform. You shouldn’t really notice any difference – aside from, hopefully, a slight speed increase.
-
19 January, 2012 at 7:37 pm #13621
Anonymous
InactiveWhatever happened with the transfer at Lunch its sorted my phone out!
I can see the site again in a readable form, don’t press any more buttons on the server & I’ll do the same with my phone! -
20 January, 2012 at 9:24 am #13634
TimKeymaster@furrypaul – I fixed that about a week ago! But yesterday I also had to remove the compression doubry*, which might effect how you see the site too if you were using an older browser.
*”doubry” being a technical term
-
20 January, 2012 at 10:25 am #13636
Anonymous
InactiveThe update last week let me access the site on the phone again but this ones actually made it so I can use it.
I’d been meaning to drop you a line to let you know but I’m more often on phone than by a pc.
-
20 January, 2012 at 10:29 am #13638
TimKeymasterAhhh – that’ll definitely be the compression thing then…
-
20 January, 2012 at 10:31 am #13639
TimKeymasterIn other news, I’m working on tweaking the front page so that it updates more quickly. You have to wait a day or so for the latest posts, etc., to appear, which isn’t ideal. If any readers are experts on incorporating feeds into WordPress pages, then please do get in touch

-
20 January, 2012 at 4:48 pm #13650
TimKeymasterFront page now tweaked – should update recent activity, news posts and so on instantly. If it looks a bit weird then it might be you’re caching the old CSS file – it’ll sort itself out soon enough
-
13 February, 2012 at 10:44 am #13739
TimKeymasterThere’s a new front page – I would like to say this was a planned change. However, a plugin update destroyed my old front page and *cough* I didn’t have a backup because I’m an idiot. So a new page was rapidly rebuilt from scratch. D’oh!
-
6 March, 2012 at 7:58 pm #13842
TimKeymasterRight – I’m planning to put in some actual and real time and effort into ironing out some of the bugs and crappy “features” on the blog and forums. So if there is anything – in terms of features – you would like to see on the blog or anything that particularly annoys you then let me know by adding to this thread.
I will try and solve the more realistic and sensible issues!
-
13 March, 2012 at 11:16 pm #13880
lizzParticipantRealistic and sensible? What could be more realistic and sensible than a free chocolate bar dispensed every time you log in?
-
14 March, 2012 at 9:11 am #13881
-
14 March, 2012 at 11:10 am #13882
Annette A
ParticipantSugar free (or not affecting bg), I hope, but tasting like proper chocolate. Please.
(I can imagine a desktop having a dispenser drawer, but what about laptops? And smartphones, well now that would be a challenge)
-
14 March, 2012 at 11:44 am #13883
TimKeymasterI was going to dispense “diabetic” chocolate bars. Tasty but they will result in a mild side-effect of uncontrollable diarrhoea. Sound okay?
-
14 March, 2012 at 12:34 pm #13884
Annette A
ParticipantTasty in what way? They’re horrible.
-
14 March, 2012 at 1:20 pm #13885
TimKeymasterSo you’re worried more about the taste than the uncontrollable diarrhoea?
-
14 March, 2012 at 2:20 pm #13886
Annette A
ParticipantMy experience is that I have to eat an awful lot of it before any effects show themselves. (I’m ‘lucky’ in that respect.) And as its not so nice, I never get to that point

-
14 March, 2012 at 2:46 pm #13887
lizzParticipantOh! Don’t you find that chocolate is quite good at not raising the blood sugar quickly as it has fat in? I never eat the nasty stuff. And, like Annette, have never suffered even if I do…
-
14 March, 2012 at 3:43 pm #13890
TimKeymasterI was going to specially commission chocolate bars that caused uncontrollable diarrhoea.
-
14 March, 2012 at 8:23 pm #13891
lizzParticipantWell, I guess that’ll be a good slimming Aid. you could advertise in all those slimming magazines and down the right-hand side of Facebook. Have Diabetes? The little tip that makes Drs hate you – join Shootup the blog to find out how to shed ponds and die laughing!
-
15 March, 2012 at 1:12 am #13893
Anonymous
Inactive@Tim so that would be XXXXLax ?
The main time that diabetes made me lose weight was before I knew I had it. Stuck in hospital after diagnosis the NHS idea on how to fatten me up was to feed me three diabetic meals each meal time.
Thats not treatment – it’s torture !
-
15 March, 2012 at 10:46 am #13895
TimKeymasterYou poor thing @ladyupnorth – did you need counselling for such torture?
-
23 March, 2012 at 9:27 am #13916
TimKeymasterThere’s been an astonishing rise in the amount of spam submissions to the blog; so I’ve added a bunch more anti-spam defences. If everything works as planned, human uses won’t notice any difference but if you find anything doesn’t work or you get automatically banned (!) then drop me an email.
-
12 April, 2012 at 10:15 am #13956
TimKeymasterOh, if anyone cares we’re currently re-designing the site to make it better. At this stage it’s not wildly different but essentially is intended to have a more distinctive look and feel and a front page that actually looks nice and works! Anyway, watch this space.
-
12 April, 2012 at 2:12 pm #13957
DaveParticipantShall I prepare my “it’s not working on mobile devices” email?

-
12 April, 2012 at 2:22 pm #13958
Anonymous
InactiveNo that “its all broken & I hate you for doing that” email, tweet & forum post is my job, can’t think why @tim doesn’t give me his phone number

But…
Why do all the forum avatars have blue circles on them now (or at least that’s what it looks like on my phone!)
-
12 April, 2012 at 2:35 pm #13959
TimKeymaster@seasiderdave – I’ve been checking the new version of the site on a mobile device as I go along, so it will work. At least it will work on my Samsung phone that I’ve tested it on and that’s all that counts to me!
-
12 April, 2012 at 2:39 pm #13960
TimKeymaster@furrypaul – he he he! I’ve spent a surprising number of hours on the new site making sure all the code is done properly, rather than hacked together as I go along. So it should a) all work and b) continue to work when plugins are updated, etc., etc.
The blue circles appear all over the place as I changed the CSS file to display a blue circle graphic wherever there was a HTML bullet code. This was to make the headlines on the front page look nice. However, HTML bullet codes appear *all over* the site in all sorts of weird places – hence the graphic appear where it shouldn’t. This is one of the many things that is sorted out on the new look site.
-
12 April, 2012 at 2:40 pm #13961
TimKeymasterBy the way, don’t get too hyped up about the new look site – it’s not that different, just tidied up.
-
13 April, 2012 at 11:01 am #13962
Anonymous
InactiveOooh I shall ready my flood of “I preferred the old look” posts. Taking my inspiration from all those that I so enjoyed reading when DUK had the affrontery to update their visual identity without asking for a signed approval slip from every single Diabetic in the UK
-
13 April, 2012 at 11:46 am #13963
TimKeymasterHa ha ha! As the Ts&Cs say “Shoot Up is not a democracy”; so much like North Korean leaders we will simply impose our will with the new look and feel!
I was just looking at the earliest copy of the site on archive.org:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090424124758/http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/
I think we should have the “What’s hot and not in diabetes” column from the original site back!
-
13 April, 2012 at 11:53 am #13964
lizzParticipantOoh, looking forward to the new look. I shall expect to like it. And am also dusting off the affronted comment section in my collection.
-
13 April, 2012 at 4:06 pm #13965
Anonymous
Inactive@tim I like the 2009 site style, it works perfectly on my phone too!
New fangled CSS stuff, I may start using the internet archive as a proxy.

-
16 April, 2012 at 9:24 am #13966
DaveParticipantI concur 2009-style rocks. Where’s the online petition? What’s the hashtag? Let’s get it, erm, “trending” < -- is that the right term? It’ll be better on dial-up too as it’s smaller. (I wish I could type the sound of a modem)
-
11 May, 2012 at 12:32 pm #14022
TimKeymasterThe observant might notice the site looks slightly different; this is a mere, minor tidy up. The big design change is still in the pipeline. Oooh, exciting!
-
11 May, 2012 at 12:32 pm #14103
TimKeymasterThe observant might notice the site looks slightly different; this is a mere, minor tidy up. The big design change is still in the pipeline. Oooh, exciting!
-
11 May, 2012 at 5:08 pm #14027
Anonymous
Inactive@tim …
Bloomin marvelous, the site looks great & is displaying properly on my phone for the first time in ages!
Don’t touch anything!
-
11 May, 2012 at 5:08 pm #14108
Anonymous
Inactive@tim …
Bloomin marvelous, the site looks great & is displaying properly on my phone for the first time in ages!
Don’t touch anything!
-
11 May, 2012 at 6:35 pm #14029
TimKeymasterHmm, we’re planning lots more look and feel changes. They will be good, but what I could do is let you have a look at the beta versions on your phone to see if they work. I’ll email you when we’re closer to a finished design. How about that for a slice of fried gold?
-
11 May, 2012 at 6:35 pm #14110
TimKeymasterHmm, we’re planning lots more look and feel changes. They will be good, but what I could do is let you have a look at the beta versions on your phone to see if they work. I’ll email you when we’re closer to a finished design. How about that for a slice of fried gold?
-
13 May, 2012 at 4:01 pm #14030
Annette A
ParticipantWhat have you done? I try to find the most recent posts, and I can only see 5 of them?
-
13 May, 2012 at 4:01 pm #14111
Annette A
ParticipantWhat have you done? I try to find the most recent posts, and I can only see 5 of them?
-
14 May, 2012 at 7:50 am #14031
-
14 May, 2012 at 7:50 am #14112
-
18 June, 2012 at 1:53 pm #14055
TimKeymasterThe blog seems to be a little flaky at the minute – the database wot runs it keeps getting corrupted. I’ve repaired most stuff but if something behaves oddly then do drop me an email and I’ll do my best to fix it!
-
18 June, 2012 at 1:53 pm #14136
TimKeymasterThe blog seems to be a little flaky at the minute – the database wot runs it keeps getting corrupted. I’ve repaired most stuff but if something behaves oddly then do drop me an email and I’ll do my best to fix it!
-
20 August, 2012 at 12:11 pm #14290
TimKeymasterI’ve had to install yet more defences against spam – we were getting loads of spammy sign ups – which while said users can’t post comments it does rather clog up the database. Anti spam plugins can sometimes effect real people so if you have any problems email me at tim@[the site’s domain].
-
12 September, 2012 at 9:36 am #14335
TimKeymasterI’m back from my holidays if anyone is wondering why there’s a sudden flurry of posts from me. You probably hadn’t even noticed I was gone *sniff*
-
18 October, 2012 at 1:06 pm #14371
TimKeymasterUpdate: yet more anti-spam defences put in place. Let me know if you have any problems logging in / viewing the site (though if you’ve got problems viewing the site then you won’t be able to read this…)
-
4 July, 2013 at 11:36 am #15426
TimKeymasterShoot Up is now hosted on a new webserver. Hopefully it’ll speed up site performance; if anything appears broken drop me an email and I’ll fix it.
-
4 July, 2013 at 1:05 pm #15430
TimKeymasterFor once, it appears that a major update to Shoot Up has worked without any surprises, mysterious crashes or catastrophic loss of data. Perhaps a first for Shoot Up!
-
10 September, 2013 at 1:51 pm #15477
TimKeymasterThat’s the site updated with a new theme and more emphasis given to the forums and that sort of thing. Enjoy!
-
4 August, 2014 at 9:47 am #15714
Anonymous
InactiveUm. This may be intentional – but it’s odd at least. When I open the main page (this here, there: http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/ without any subpages) I get a few random posts displayed. Which is occasionally confusing, when something “brand new 2009” pops up. It makes for interesting reading, but I sort of liked the chronological order.
Edit: Also .. refreshing the page gives me new random posts. I’m not sure that means it’s me being especially weird or “that’s how it was planned”.
-
5 February, 2016 at 4:21 pm #15759
TimKeymasterI’ve just smartened up the site a little – let me know if anything’s broken
-
12 February, 2016 at 1:09 pm #15791
DaveParticipantGod bless Google Chrome.
This page is saved in my favourites http://www.shootuporputup.co.uk/activity/Appears now not to show recent activity. Shall I delete the link or any chance of it being resurrected as I always used it as a cheats way to see if anything new had been put on the ;
-
12 February, 2016 at 1:22 pm #15792
TimKeymasterYeah, I turned that function off as it was getting spammed to hell. But now I’ve put some new anti-spam stuff on, I might turn it on again. Gimme five minutes!
-
12 February, 2016 at 4:55 pm #15806
TimKeymasterIf you find anything usual with your user account – it posts as “anonymous” rather than your name and suchlike – then do let me know and I’ll fix your account.
-
4 March, 2016 at 9:07 am #15875
TimKeymasterSoftware update – you can now use emojis on the blog and forums 😀 Please don’t.
-
12 February, 2016 at 4:22 pm #15802
TimKeymasterAnd the activity stream is working again after deleting several thousand spam accounts and over 10,000 spam activity comments! Hopefully I’ll be able to keep on top of the spam now.
I’ve added a handy link in the top menu. Whoo hoo!
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
