- This topic has 14 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
5 December, 2011 at 2:05 pm #6103
Anonymous
InactiveWhen did advent calendars become a box of chocolates?
They used to be diabetic friendly items offering a festive picture of carbohydrate free wise men on camels or a sugar free robin on a holly tree. You didn’t have to bolus for opening a window. Now its all changed
On Saturday a chocolate angel had absolutely no impact on my cgm yet the chocolate train engine yesterday caused a rapid rise and the need for a bolus. With 20 windows to go I’m hoping for a lot more angels and very few train engines.
-
5 December, 2011 at 3:54 pm #9190
TimKeymasterI’ve actually quite enjoyed my advent calender this year – it’s a Divine chocolate one and said chocolate tastes rather good, whic is perhaps a first for advent calender chocolate!
-
5 December, 2011 at 5:21 pm #9192
AlisonKeymasterFor me, advent calendars became chocolate when I was about 18. Before then I always had the rather dull, picture only ;
-
5 December, 2011 at 7:53 pm #9193
Anonymous
InactiveA chocolate train whatever next? Surely holly/shepherds/ox/candles or bells are more appropriate. Since when has a train been chrismassy? I blame that Polar Express! Bah Humbug.
-
8 December, 2011 at 9:33 am #9207
Anonymous
InactiveI didn’t think adults had Advent calendars!!! I’ve never had one since I was about 10!
-
8 December, 2011 at 11:23 am #9211
-
8 December, 2011 at 11:55 am #9217
-
8 December, 2011 at 12:23 pm #9221
TimKeymasterOkay – perhaps “massive chocolate glut” was a bit of an exaggeration!
-
8 December, 2011 at 5:51 pm #9223
Anonymous
InactiveI surely can’t be the only person for whom 4g (max) of chocolate in the morning has absolutely no effect? I can’t even be bothered to enter the extra 4g into my pump.
Then again, Christmas always brings out my rebellious side
-
8 December, 2011 at 7:07 pm #9224
Anonymous
Inactive@martynp No effect!!! The NICE guidelines team have a sense of humour towards accurate Carb Counting like the Her Majestys Revenue & Customs have toward Tax fraud!
I don’t think megs wasn’t referring to boluses but the use of a continuous glucose monitor which give a useful indication for rate of change of blood sugar but a wild stab in the dark at a correct value from what I understand, whilst setting off a ;
-
9 December, 2011 at 9:03 am #9230
TimKeymaster@furrypaul – your comment comparing NICE to HMRC genuinely made me laugh out loud!
-
9 December, 2011 at 9:05 am #9231
-
9 December, 2011 at 6:25 pm #9236
Anonymous
InactiveYes… mmm indeed.
I might have to go and raid the tree for those tree chocolates… I feel less guilty eating those because I think I must burn at least 1/9th of a calorie in frustration searching for them…
-
14 December, 2011 at 12:31 pm #9265
AlisonKeymasterAdvent calendar news…while my first 2 weeks worth of chocolates didn’t require a bolus, I’ve just discovered that as we get nearer to Christmas my chocolates get bigger. I am disproportionately pleased about this, even if it does mean I need to start bolusing for them.
-
14 December, 2011 at 7:16 pm #9281
Anonymous
InactiveAlthough my chocolates are not getting bigger the nearer to Christmas we get I have noticed a theme. The only chocolate shapes requiring a small bolus have been modes of transport. A train engine, a sleigh and today a camel. Hmmm
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

~~