Review – Accu-Chek Aviva Nano

By | 9 June, 2009
The Nano and a reflected Tim

The Nano and a reflected Tim

Along with being potty-trained, you learn disappointment at an early age. I remember when I was delightful young nipper (I was young once, honest) waiting in giddy anticipation for Christmas Day. Being small I didn’t give a flying damn about the togetherness of family, I was sleeplessly waiting for Father Christmas to deliver the latest LEGO airport model.

As you all know, the LEGO airport was the epitome of cool for the 1980’s small boy. It came with a full terminal building, landing lights, air traffic control – the works. The mere thought sends the hair up on the back of my neck even now.

However, as I ripped off the wrapping paper I uncovered a LEGO digger. My heart sunk, it was pretty damned cool but it just wasn’t the airport I wanted. For the first time ever my tiny frame encountered the terrible feeling of disappointment.

Forward-wind 25 years and one failed-pancreas later and that feeling re-occurred as I spent a week testing the Roche Accu-Chek Aviva Nano. I ordered my Aviva Nano via the Intermaweb and was, again, giddy with anticipation. Here was a meter that looked and sounded cool. Shiny and black like Michael Knight’s KITT car, but without the cheesy wise-cracks and flaky plotlines.

I unwrapped the box and was delighted. Delighted, that is, until I put a test strip in. The test strips work well enough but they look seriously clunky and ugly compared to the Aviva Nano itself. It was like a country yokel with straw in his hair attending an Ambassador’s ball. In this case the test strip was the yokel and the meter the dinner-suited posho sneering at the unwelcome guest.

Getting down to actual business I did actually like the Aviva Nano an awful lot. First off it’s utterly tiny and should really carry a warning about accidental swallowing it’s so petite. The three buttons are hidden round the sides and top of the meter giving a nice, sleek minimalist look to the device.

While it doesn’t have a backlight, the figures on the screen glow with a cool, slightly eerie blue which is easy enough to see in the dark for your unscheduled 4am hypo. The buttons I liked a moment ago can be difficult to find in the dark but it’s certainly no worse than any other meter. Needless to say, the Holy Grail of a meter that lights up the strip itself doesn’t happen here (will it ever, I wonder?)

The Aviva Nano has a reasonable memory and can display your averages over the last 30 days or so but doesn’t do anything more fancy like drawing graphs, etc., not that graphs are all that useful.

Results can be marked as pre-food or after-food using a cute apple icon and the meter can be set to beep to automatically remind you to test one or two hours after a meal; alarms can also be set for particular times which is surely a boon for the forgetful or negligent. These alarms are actually relatively useful and a moderately innovative idea. It seems Roche have actually put a reasonable amount of thought into what might be useful for the diabetic-on-the-Clapham-omnibus instead of churning out another meter with the same features as every other one on the market. Good for Roche.

After a week’s testing, I liked the Aviva Nano – it’s a small, neat, relatively sexy meter – if only they could do something about the clunky test strips it could become my regular every day meter. And you can’t get better than that!

So, finally, in summary:

Sample size > 2/5
0.6?L – quite a large sample in these modern times. Boo!

Test time > 3/5
5 seconds. Mmmm, okay I suppose. Nothing special.

Test strip calibration > 2/5
Yes, each batch needs to be calibrated. Boo!

Test strip slurpiness > 4/5
Very good, but yokel-styling raises a grimace each and every time you use one.

Memory > 3/5
500 tests

Sexiness > 4.5/5
Oh baby; sleek, petite and sexy with funky lighting. Pity about the vile test strips.

Beeping > 5/5
Can be turned off, yay! But can also beep usefully at you to remind you to test if required.

4am test > 3/5
Glow in the dark figures are nice, buttons can be fiddly in the pitch dark.

Total > 26.5/40

Read about our blood glucose meter reviews.

11 thoughts on “Review – Accu-Chek Aviva Nano

  1. Pingback: Review – Bayer Contour | Shoot Up or Put Up

  2. Pingback: Answers to search engine queries | Shoot Up or Put Up

  3. Pingback: Blood Glucose Meter of the Year | Shoot Up or Put Up

  4. anwesh

    hey thanks for the review..i got one query.. i cant find any nano strips in the market. are the strips the same that of accu chek active, or is there a seperate set of strips released for nano?? please reply as soon as possible,


  5. Alex

    I use the same ones as with my old “Aviva”. They seem to work and give sensible results.
    Rather looking forward to the Bayer USB meter. Is there such a thing as a diabetes gadget geek?

  6. Tim

    @Alex One of the very few benefits of diabetes is having access to a whole new load of gadgets!

    Out of interest, why are you looking forward to the Bayer USB meter? It seems to be getting a lot of hypo – but it just looks like a meter to me…

  7. Samantha

    gotta say i’m looking forward to the contour usb too. I mean it has a colour screen, and coloured lancets and is super super tiny 😀 plus, it plus into the ole comp which just makes me go ooooooooooooooooooooo /geekout 😀

  8. Alex

    @Tim I do like the Nano, as it’s quite small. However, the abiity to keep records and download them is a lot easier than having to manually enter them into Diamedic.
    Wish Apple would make glucose meters…

  9. David

    I,ve just collected my new ‘Nano’ having used an Accu-Chek Active for 5+ years. Great small meter however the soft case makes it the same size as the ‘Active’ and therefore still a little impractical for pockets. There’s seems little point in Roche research & development creating a super compact meter if the pot for the test strips increases in size along with the finger pricker! I went for the ‘Nano’ thinking I would no longer need to disturb my wife’s sleep turning the light to test in the wee hours of course forgetting that you need to see the blob of blood on your finger tip, having first found & inserted the strip the right way round. The supplied case doesn’t appear to have been designed around the Nano. If you put the meter in what appears to be the correct pocket & the strip pot in the elastic loop provided you can’t shut it properly. It’s very cheap & I can’t see it lasting as well as the very practical hard case supplied with the Active. Verdict: Trendy meter but a bit more research needed by Roche regarding the way diabetics actually use their equipment on a daily basis. Lets face it they make huge profits from the test strip sales.

  10. allan

    Well had the samne expecience – i.e. being dispapointed. Aviva Nano is really a very ordinary device despite its fancy look – when it comes to performance compared to size I definitely stick to Freestyle Lite


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *