Shoot Up or Put Up

You are browsing the archive for review.

Avatar of Dave

by Dave

Review – LifeScan OneTouch Verio Pro

16 August, 2011 in General reviews, Meter reviews

The Verio Pro

A Verio Pro, yesterday

How come I’m testing and reviewing?

After spotting an advert in Balance, I called Lifescan to blag a new OneTouch Verio Pro to test out. From the advert it seemed like a very, very slimmed down version of the Aviva Expert and it claimed to be able to spot patterns of high and low readings and to make suggests if dosages needed altering.

There was also mention of its “GlucoFilter” which “corrects for the presence of certain substances that, when present at therapeutic levels, commonly interfere with accurate BG results, such as paracetamol and Vitamin C.” That’s all new on me but I thought I’d give it a go…

In the box

The meter arrives in the usual shiny box and inside is the meter itself, a pack of ten test strips, the OneTouch Comfort finger-pricker with stabby things, black carry case roughly 17cm by 10cm, control solution, plenty of leaflets and a manual the size of a small novel.

The meter

Sized 57mm x 88m (roughly twice the size of the Accu-Chek Aviva Nano) with three buttons on the front and a slot at the top for the test strip. The display is very clear and similar in shade to a generic e-book reader with the added benefit of being backlit for the dark. Although I always have issues when testing in the dark with actually getting the blood that’s slowly coming out of my finger onto the strip.

One huge plus is that it takes 2 AAA batteries to power it.  The big issue with my current, favoured, Aviva Nano is the use of flat CR2032 batteries that aren’t cheap to replace. Be aware though it’s not possible to use rechargeable batteries in the meter, according to the hefty manual.

The stabber

I cannot emphasise enough how impressed I was with the blood extractor. It is easily the least painful pricker I’ve used, although the needles aren’t as hard-wearing as my previous Multiclix so will not be suitable for those that replace their lancets less frequently.

In use

The test strips need blood applying from the side, which is different for me but it just might be I’ve not come across that style of strip before [Abbott's FreeStyle Lite also has sideways strips - Tim]. The strips need 0.4 µl of blood, which isn’t too bad and results are returned in 5 seconds after a countdown on the display.

The brains

The data analysis is where I had really high hopes for the Verio Pro and I was maybe a little over-optimistic in what I believed it could offer me. It comes with average analysis scores over 7, 14 and 30 days. Results can be tagged as before-meal, after-meal, fasting or bedtime.

The highly promising trend analysis looks at your BG and will display a message depending on whether it spots patterns in your BG. The lower limit of the acceptable range is set at 3.8mmol/L but the upper pre-meal limit is changeable depending on your own targets.

A low pattern message will appear when you get a ‘low’ (under 3.8) BG on any 2 days within the same 3 hour period over the last 5 consecutive days.

A high pattern message will appear when you get a ‘high’ BG on any 3 days with the test tagged as pre-meal within the same 3hr period over the last 5 consecutive days. This only works for pre-meal tagged tests.

That’s it. No more analysis given, which is a great shame. There’s obviously potential here but the inability to add insulin or notes for exercise, etc., means that the 1,001 other variables can’t be spotted to help you work out what’s really causing the lows or highs apart from insulin dosage. The fact that the high analysis only works when the test is tagged as pre-meal removes the potential to analyse for insulin effectiveness, say, two hours after eating.

Overall

It does seem a nice tidy meter but I’m not sure it’s offering much over a pen and paper. The fact it looks at 5 days of data is the most useful point but for me the variables outside of insulin dosage are too significant for me to base dosage adjustments purely on 2 tests from 5.

The added promise of the Glucofilter mentioned in the marketing blurb is maybe something I’ve never noticed before.  Whilst just scanning through the manual now to try and find another mention of it, and failing, I came across a description of the ‘Extreme Low’ warning.  This will display when the result is below 1.1mmol/L.  Now it might just be me, but if I was still conscious at 1.1 I’m not sure the message, if my eyes were functioning well enough to read it, would be enough to convince me I need to get carbs fast anyway.

In summary I’m afraid that for me it’s gone back in the box as a useful reserve that I don’t think will ever turn into my regular meter. Sorry OneTouch.

Obviously I’m only one user so others my find it very useful and with further use it may become more beneficial but not for me.

However, GET THE PRICKER and a hefty supply of sharps and your digits will love you forever more!

Check out the manufacturer’s website here: http://www.lifescan.co.uk/ourproducts/meter/one-touch-verio-pro

Avatar of Alison

by Alison

Did the sensor (En)lite up my life?

5 May, 2011 in Kit & equipment

And so the day has come. I have called an end to 12 days of loyal service from my first Medtronic Enlite CGM sensor. How was it for me? Well…

The much smaller Enlite sensor (attached to the Minilink transmitter)

Overall it was very good. I’ve no real complaints. It seems a good bit of kit that’s an improvement on the old sensors. Not a life changing, swinging from the lampshades, best thing in the world ever improvement, but a good step forward.

Let’s start at the beginning with insertion. This is much improved. It still fires in with a fair amount of force but - I suspect due to the finer, more polished needle - it really doesn’t hurt. It’s still a surprise when it goes in, as it is when anyone fires a bit of metal into your body at speed, but it’s not a painful surprise.  I don’t have the patience to talk you through the whole insertion process, but if you want to see an animated model inserting the Enlite into his beautifully toned, hair free stomach – take a look here, it’s an accurate representation of what I did.

It did feel like 3 hands would have been useful at times as the insertion process and associated stickies were a bit fiddly at times. With the old sensors I was pretty adept at putting them into my back, but I think it’ll be a while before I attempt that with the Enlite, I need to be 100% happy with the process first. I think a bit of practice will sort this out. 

I was a little disappointed that the packaging is bigger than with the previous sensors. In the grand scheme of things, this is a pretty insignificant whinge, but when you’re trying to fit two weeks worth of infusion sets and sensors plus spares in to a bag, it’s a pain. Then every extra centimeter of packaging counts, and they’ve certainly added a few centimeters. I know there are scientists out there who have dedicated decades of their careers to making this wonderful tech, and I also know it’s bigger to accomodate the plastic bit that now hides the previously scary insertion needle, but as a trend, stuff should be getting smaller, not bigger.

The sensor goes in vertically, like a Quickset, which means there’s no more faffing around like there was with the old ones trying to get the exact angle correct, you just whack it in. That’s good. The insertion process felt a bit longer than with the old ones but I think that was because it was new and I wasn’t used to it. A couple more weeks and it’ll be second nature.

The sensors use the same Minilink transmitter, and now come with a sticky bit to secure that to the body. It did seem pretty robust, but I don’t like having any part of the transmitter exposed to catch things on, so I stuck my usual bit of sticky tape over the whole lot anyway.

Once you’re all connected, there’s still the usual 2 hour start up time (although rumour has it this is due to the programming in the Veo pump rather than the sensor, if allowed the sensor would be up and running straight away – I’ve asked for confirmation of that from Medtronic and am awaiting a response). After that 2 hours, it needs calibrating with a blood test. Previously you had to calibrate at that 2 hour point, then again after 6 hours. This one doesn’t require another calibration for 12 hours.

The big question is of course, is it more accurate? The stats say it is. Medtronic reckon its 17% better overall and 26% better when it comes to low blood sugars. That is of course pretty meaningless if you’re a 6 and it says you’re a 10, so in the real world is it actually any better? I’m reluctant to judge it based on one sensor, but yes, it did seem more accurate.

With the old sensors, if they said I was 3.5, I’d usually find I was in the 2’s. When the new one said I was 2.8, I was actually 2.6 so pretty damn close. Equally with highs, it tracked me more accurately all the way up to 16.8 and back again, better than the old sensors. Obviously these extremes of blood sugars were deliberate in order to test the sensor, they in no way reflect insulin/carb errors by the user.

When I had normal control, the readings were more accurate than with the old sensors. The lag between sensor readings and meter readings seems less than the old 20mins. I had very few accuracy issues with the old sensors and had been using them for so long I tended to know when to expect issues, so I wasn’t expecting massive improvements. However, I am impressed in that it does seem more accurate, even for me.  I’d be interested to know what difference the new sensors make for people who struggled with accuracy with the previous sensors.

The Enlite is registered for use for 6 days. On day 6 I turned off the sensor on the pump, disconnected the transmitter, recharged it for 20mins then reconnected to the sensor and started it up again on the pump. It picked up the sensor after the 2 hour warm up, I calibrated it and I was off and running for another 6 days. The sensor was still working perfectly at 12 days, but I pulled it because I don’t like leaving stuff in my body for much longer than that.

Overall, it seems a good step forward with the whole CGM malarkey, of which I am a huge fan.

Avatar of Alison

by Alison

Picking a pump in 2011

28 January, 2011 in Kit & equipment, The Blog

The time has come. It’s hard to believe but its four years since I got my pump and its warranty is nearing an end so it needs to be replaced. On one hand, I can’t believe four years have passed since I stepped into a brave new world and felt a bit like I was having to learn everything I ever knew about diabetes all over again. On the other, I can’t imagine life without my pump and CGM any more.

Anyway, don’t tell the pump (because I need its loyalty for a few more months yet and it has a tendency to get stroppy), but the end is nigh and I’m on the hunt for a replacement. A quick survey of the pump marketplace shows that things don’t seem to have moved on a great deal since I last looked at the pump market in 2009, but there have been some developments so what are my choices?  

Omnipod now sell their tubeless pump in the UK which is real progress. Last time I thought the egg sized pod was too big to have attached to me for 3 days without being able to take it off and the lack of tubing left me in fear of leaving the remote behind as I dashed out the door. Having poked around at the Omipod at an exhibition I’m afraid that’s still my view. For me the pod needs to be much smaller and I need some way of convincing myself I won’t forget to pick up the remote before I’m up for that.

The Accu-Chek combo is still a tempting offer with its fully functioning remote control that also acts as a blood glucose meter. This means I can hide my pump in my bra and then use the remote to do a blood test, calculate how much insulin I need with the built in bolus wizard and then instruct the pump to deliver the insulin, all without having to delve into my bra in public. This is very tempting. Where the Omnipod fails me is that if I don’t have the remote I can’t bolus. With this, I can bolus with the pump (which is attached to me via tube so I’m going to have to try hard to leave it somewhere) or with the remote. The cynic in me does wonder though whether this is just a smart new remote to tart up a pretty old pump model.

Non-pumpers, if you’ve glazed over at the thought of all this tech, Accu-Chek seem to have done something clever by taking the intelligence behind pump bolus wizards and making it available to those on MDI.  Nice idea. The Accu-Chek Aviva Expert is on their website but info is pretty sparse. There is a pretty detailed review by Mike over at EveryDayUpsAndDowns if you want to know more.

The Animas 2020 seems to be big on looks and personalisation. It has a huge screen compared to the others so you can see a lot of data without flipping through menus. And their bolus wizard is customisable so you can input your favourite foods. It gets a big plus for having tiny 0.025U/hr basal increments meaning you can really tailor your basal rates to the nth degree.

Finally, we get to the incumbent. I’ve had a Medtronic pump for four years and I’m happy with it. Their latest, the Metronic Paradigm Veo is an updated version of my current pump. This is where the whole reviewing the market process falls apart. The big screens, sexy remotes and customisable bolus wizards are nice to have but they can’t compete with the one killer app offered by this pump – integrated CGM. I will sacrifice virtually anything for that. Speaking to an Animas rep 18 months ago they were very hopeful of offering a pump with Dexcom CGM integrated by 2010 but I’ve seen no sign of that. I’m not willing to wear a pump and carry a separate receiver for the CGM when an integrated version is available so it means my only choice is the Paradigm Veo.

This is no great hardship. Like the Aminas, it too has the tiny 0.025U/hr basal increments which will be an improvement on the 0.05 setting I currently have. The bolus wizard works well and I’m so used to it I find it really intuitive. I can’t fault the service I’ve had from Medtronic over the last four years. My problems have been minor, evenso they were fixed fast. The CGM functionality has been improved so I can now set it to alarm if I’m rising or falling quickly (great for anticipating highs and lows and taking early action) and it has the reassuring safety feature of if the CGM detects I am low and I don’t respond to the numerous alarms, it’ll suspend insulin delivery for up to 2 hours. Interesting.

So, just like four years ago, my choice is simple.  Integrated CGM is top of my list; therefore it has to be the Paradigm Veo. If pumps were like Mr PotatoHead and I could customise to my heart’s content, I would add in a fully functioning remote that displayed my blood sugar from the CGM and allowed me to dose remotely. Until the PotatoHead pump is available though, it looks like I’m sticking with Medtronic.

Review – Accu-Chek Mobile

12 January, 2011 in General reviews, Meter reviews

An Accu-Chek Mobile blood glucose testing meter, yesterday

An Accu-Chek Mobile blood glucose testing meter, yesterday

A gnomish review of an innovative device.

What’s in the box?

The device comes in the standard sort of meter packaging, a windowed box which displays the meter.  Inside is the meter, of course, a separately packaged test cassette, a lancet cassette for the FastClix finger stabbing device, and half a rainforest.

Actually, the half a rainforest is mainly made up of an excellent handbook (239 pages) that tells you all you need to know about setting up your meter for the first time (practically nothing), and starting to use it.  The rest of it consists of a quick reference guide, a card you can send off to get the carry case of your choice, a welcome pack containing registration cards and a card to hand to your GP or DSN, so you can change your repeat prescription to cassettes and FastClix cartridges.

All very glossy, well presented, and pretty comprehensive, such a pity all my communications with Roche are via the internet, but at least it’s all recyclable.

The Meter

When you finally get down to looking at the meter itself, apart from the fact that it’s big and black with a snazzy silver fascia, the first thing to strike you is the slider that covers the test area, rather than an open slot for inserting strips.  Not only does this protect the innards of the meter from pocket and bag fluff (possibly even belly button fluff, but we won’t go there!), opening it will switch the meter on and move a test patch into place ready to test.

There are still the usual three buttons on the face of the meter, but these are more to do with menu selection than testing.  In this respect the device bears much more resemblance to a mobile phone than its predecessors do as all the settings are accessed by a simple menu system.

There are many settings to play with too, results can be flagged, reminders set, and target ranges set, plus display brightness as well as the usual time and date settings.  None of this is beyond the capabilities of anyone that can use a cell phone, but it is a step up from the average meter.

On the other hand, you can ignore all the bells and whistles, just drop in a cassette, and trot off into the sunset.  It’s a nice piece of kit with the feel of quality one would expect from Roche products.

Setup

Setting up couldn’t be easier, open the slider, open the cassette door, and drop in the cassette.  Close the door and the slider and you’re ready to test.  Pop the lancet cartridge in the finger stabber and you’re loaded for bear!  Time and date are preset, so there’s no need to change them.

Use

Open the slider, just be a little bit careful not to snag the tape, the meter switches on, checks the display, announces the number of tests available, and moves a test patch into position before telling you it’s ready, all this is remarkably quick.  Inflict the usual gratuitous violence on your selected finger, and touch the patch on the cassette to the resultant gob of gore, uptake by the tape is almost instantaneous.

In five seconds or less you’ll have a result.  Close the slider, and the meter will switch off after displaying the result, telling you how many tests you have left, and winding the used test patch into the cassette.  Job Done!

I have to add, that this meter takes all the fiddlyness out of testing, it’s just a case of set the finger stabber, switch on, test, switch off.  You can probably do it almost as quickly as you read my description.

For the Geeks

Downloading data couldn’t be simpler; all you need is an infra-red connection.  Users of the Roche software (Accu-Chek Compass or Accu-Chek 360°) will have one anyway.  If you just have an infra- red connection and no software, this meter can export the data as a comma separated (CSV) file that can be imported into a spreadsheet or word processor.  This file includes the download date, download time, and the serial number of the meter.

Conclusion

This is a really good piece of kit, whilst it might not be the meter of choice for some of us that like our meters to be small and sexy, (like Tim) I like it.

It’s a natural step up from the ease of use of the Accu-Chek Compact Plus.  Fifty tests on a cassette, six lancets in a cartridge, and no need to touch a single test strip or a lancet.  Add to that the fact that both items can be dumped in the household rubbish after use, and you begin to realise testing can’t get any easier or quicker than this.

I have no hesitation in recommending the Accu-Chek Mobile to everyone.  (My cheque from Roche is in the post they tell me? [You wish - Tim])

Results

Sample size: > 5/5
0.3µl (approximately)

Test time: > 4/5
5 seconds (approximately)

Test strip calibration: > 5/5
None required, the cassette has an RFI chip that calibrates the meter automatically.

Test strip slurpiness: > 5/5
Mega slurpy, almost instantaneous vampiric uptake.

Memory: > 5/ 5
500 tests with averages available for 7, 14, and 30 days.  It is also possible to set up to ten reminder times

Sexiness: > 2/5
About as sexy as a house brick, perhaps ‘butch’ would be a better description. 2

Beeping:  > 4/5
Switchable

4am test:  > 3/5
There is no backlight, but the figures are very high contrast, bright fluorescent yellow on black.  Whether ‘tis is enough to protect the device from fits of hypoglycaemic rage remains to be seen.

Overall: An excellent meter, the one all new meters will have to look up to! 33/40